Session Mechanicals and ventilation Designers and consultants Builders and trades
Multifamily ERVs: Centralized or In-Suite?
Centralized and in-suite ERVs compared through two Passive House multifamily projects in Vancouver, Vienna House and 981 Davie St.: performance, cost, installation, and integration with heating and cooling.
Key points
- The key differences between centralized and in-suite ERV systems.
- Performance, installation, and lifecycle costs, from real projects.
- The trade-offs of each approach for design, operations, and occupants.
- How each integrates with heating and cooling.
- Design and commissioning considerations for performance and maintenance.
Learning objectives
- Identify the key differences between centralized and in-suite ERV systems in Passive House multifamily buildings.
- Compare the performance, installation requirements, and lifecycle costs of centralized and distributed ventilation strategies using real-world case studies.
- Evaluate the advantages, limitations, and trade-offs of each ventilation approach based on building design, operations, and occupant needs.
- Assess how centralized and in-suite ERV systems integrate with heating and cooling systems to support high-performance building design.
- Describe the design and commissioning considerations that influence ventilation system performance, maintenance, and long-term resilience.
Topics: Ventilation
More in this area
Dealing with Heat Waves: Can We Use the PHPP to Size Cooling Equipment?
Oliver Style, Praxis Resilient Buildings
Free to watch
Schools & the Passive House Standard
2 AIA LU|HSW · 2 PHI credits
Live online
Passive House Mechanicals
2 AIA LU|HSW · 2 PHI credits
Live online

